Kittiratt says rice scheme losses won't reach B300bn | Bangkok Post: news

News > Local News

Kittiratt says rice scheme losses won't reach B300bn

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Kittiratt Na-Ranong has insisted the government's rice pledging will not incur losses of up to 300 billion baht as critics claim, and says he is ready to clarify the scheme.

Mr Kittiratt's remarks yesterday were in response to a research study by the Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). The study claimed that the rice pledging scheme would swell public debt and hurt the country's economy.

The TDRI was behind the Democrat-led government's rice price guarantee scheme, so the institute's criticism of the Pheu Thai-led government's policy is to be expected, he said.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 11 : 23 Nov 2012 at 18.0711

    "He said the rice pledging scheme, which pays 15,000 baht per tonne for white rice paddy, might incur some losses"

    Looks like Kittiratt is finally admitting that this policy puts the country in debt and not sustainable like they said.

  • dao

    ThailandPost : 4,657

    Send message

    Discussion 10 : 23 Nov 2012 at 16.2310

    Responsible governemnt doesnt need to do secret deals and destroy industry .

  • Discussion 9 : 23 Nov 2012 at 14.329

    Keeping trade figures secret is not only wrong but unconstitutional as well and of course will support suspicions. If you have nothing to hide show what you have.

  • Discussion 8 : 23 Nov 2012 at 13.288

    He has been wrong before why should things change.Keep digging that big hole and with a bit of luck you will fall in it and then someone with some common sense can try and untangle the mess you have made.

  • Discussion 7 : 23 Nov 2012 at 11.307

    RE: D1 you have made the accusations, but not shown even one shred of proof to back up your allegations. The scheme may be good for rice farmers and those that are in the market of buying and selling rice, but it is not all TS's people. The whole general idea of trying to have state minimums on rice to me is a poor plan, but it is not illegal, and no proof of a government sponsored corruption has been shown. In my opinion the promotion of other crops other than rice would have been the way to slow the supply of rice and raise the price w/o any government subsidies.

  • Discussion 6 : 23 Nov 2012 at 10.326

    The losses won't reach 300 billion? Are we supposed to be relieved by this news?

  • dao

    ThailandPost : 4,657

    Send message

    Discussion 5 : 23 Nov 2012 at 09.475

    Lets debate the losses .How sad .

  • Discussion 4 : 23 Nov 2012 at 09.434

    Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Kittiratt Na-Ranong says he is ready to clarify the scheme. He has had months to clarify the scheme but hasn't. I don't think he knows or anyone else knows how.

  • Discussion 3 : 23 Nov 2012 at 09.243

    Mr. Kittirat, please admit you made a big mistake and try to do it right. Please show some compassion for the poor rice farmers and other types of farmers as well.

  • Discussion 2 : 23 Nov 2012 at 07.212

    The problem is that different groups have plenty of figures and information why this scheme is no good, but the government has none to really counter the accusations. Instead, they try to keep numbers secret. Totally wrong.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.