The politics of the streets | Bangkok Post: opinion

Opinion > Opinion

The politics of the streets

By imposing the Internal Security Act ahead of today's planned rally by Pitak Siam, the government has shown that it takes this misguided political movement with its old-fashioned ideas far more seriously than many had realised. The obvious assumption is that the administration knows something that the rest of the country does not and has proof of wrongdoing or ill intent beyond the serious accusations it has already made. If that is the case and some sort of "insurrection" is planned under the guise of a rally, then arrests of suspects and a detailed public briefing are presumably imminent. Democracy does grant many rights but these do not include the right to cause chaos or instigate the violent overthrow of governments.

Then again, perhaps the government is aware of just how quickly matters got out of hand in 2008 and 2010 and has opted to err on the side of caution and public order. It was careful to wait until the Constitution Court had issued its ruling stating it had found no grounds to believe the rally was aimed at overthrowing the country's democratic system of government before it invoked the act, which allows the administration and its security forces to suspend normal law enforcement in three districts. This covers the Royal Plaza which has a rich heritage as the site of democratic rallies and loyal gatherings in the past; a role it will no doubt repeat in the future, whether or not the Pitak Siam rally, with its confusing and dictatorial agenda of pushing for an appointed government, goes ahead. If it does, as seems likely, police will need to take extra care in dealing with demonstrators to avoid any flare-ups or injuries. The art is to control the crowds without provoking confrontation.

Hopes that security forces and onlookers would outnumber the demonstrators in the wake of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra's nationwide plea for people to stay away might well rebound because they fail to take into account the enormous advance publicity the government has inadvertently given the rally. There has already been a flurry of fanciful conspiracy theories on social media sites and this scaremongering has hyped what should have been a day-long gathering by a misguided pressure group trying to turn the clock back into something far more menacing. Such rumours and panic attacks are needless. It is time to let cool heads and common sense prevail. The days of coups and appointed governments are over.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 13 : 25 Nov 2012 at 11.5013

    It is very rarely that the editorials in BP are not full of sound common sense and are not factual. However the editorial of the 24th November is not in that category. One of the rights essential to democracy is the right to protest and protest on the streets.
    Thailand is not a democracy and it should not call itself a democracy. Having the right to vote, does not make it a democracy.
    The demonstration was democractic in that it raised this very point. It should not be compared with 2006 or 2010, they have nothing in common.
    Mr. Editor, you got it very wrong this time.

  • Discussion 12 : 24 Nov 2012 at 19.0712

    I think the Government's decision to err on the side of caution was probably correct on the back of the Constitutional Court's in my view questionable decision to allow the rally go ahead.

  • Discussion 11 : 24 Nov 2012 at 13.1611

    Very even handed editorial.

  • Discussion 10 : 24 Nov 2012 at 13.1510

    jacksprat D3

    Did you friend get to BKK? Is there any evidence that road blocks are stopping people getting to the rally, they may just be to check for illegal activity, weapons etc.

  • Discussion 9 : 24 Nov 2012 at 12.579

    The reds burnt and destroyed, said all was for demorcacy. And then you have the country run by a family and family friends government. So does this editor called this democracy. And my dear editor, most of us believe that the guy organizing this rally has a video clip that the government does not want us to see or hear. Have your reporters asked not to report this? When is your next interview with Thaksin on the government sponsored TV channels. To you Yinluck wearing a red shirt and joinint the red protests makes better sense?

  • lek

    ThailandPost : 779

    Send message

    Discussion 8 : 24 Nov 2012 at 11.408

    An excellent article, but the ballot box is useless if it is stuffed with paid-for votes!

  • Discussion 7 : 24 Nov 2012 at 11.397

    D1, I wonder: Could you name one country's "democracy" that is perfect? We all know it is not Thailand's. But could you tell us something new?

  • Discussion 6 : 24 Nov 2012 at 10.436

    The police is the fugitive's private brownshirt army. They will do whatever he orders or like in 2010 do nothing if he so orders.

  • Discussion 5 : 24 Nov 2012 at 10.395

    I agree that the government's reaction to this protest has actually provided it, not only huge publicity, but also - for those who don't understand basic terms such as 'democracy' and 'dictatorship' - some credibility. That said, one must not forget that this group is demanding a military coup followed by an indefinite military regime. Both of these are, by definition, anti-democracy, anti-law, anti-human rights, and anti-peace. Thus, a group that actively opposes these things, not to mention a group that is little more than a re-branding of a previous group with a known history of violence, should be treated with great caution.

  • Discussion 4 : 24 Nov 2012 at 08.454

    D!: do you have the right to elect a senate? do you have a right to elect a military coup? Or are those types of things selected by a few old men in yellow t shirts?
    The government is doing the right thing by not letting trouble take root. That is what happened in both 06, and 10....once the strong holds have been established it is impossible to dislodge it without violence and bloodshed. Every one has a right to peaceful protest, but no one has a right to take over government buildings airports and public streets. No one has the legal right to over throw the elected government by military force.

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.