Stamp out the trade in ivory | Bangkok Post: opinion

Opinion > Opinion

Stamp out the trade in ivory

Although Sundays are a traditional day of rest, few in Bangkok will be taking it easy on March 3. More than 2 million citizens will flock to the polls to elect their new governor while delegates who have flown into the capital from all over the world kick off what is expected to be a heated two-week meeting on animal and plant conservation. The cruelties of the ivory trade and the hunting of species to extinction will be high on the agenda as delegates ponder how best to combat an illegal trade in wildlife and rare plants worth hundreds of billions of baht a year.

It is the first time since 2004 that the United Nations Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (Cites) has convened its triennial meeting here and, while the official position might be not to ruffle the feathers of the host nation, behind the scenes there will be criticism over what is seen as this country's lukewarm enforcement of wildlife conservation measures and the ease with which criminals seem able to circumvent the international trade ban on ivory. This led to concern being expressed by the United States last October. Without giving specifics, Washington claimed that revenue from the illegal African ivory trade was going to guerrilla groups, which used the dirty money to buy weapons.

While Cites did well by outlawing the international trade in ivory in 1989, there is a legal loophole which gangs are exploiting. Because the sale of ivory from domestic Thai elephants is permitted, criminals smuggle in ivory from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda and lie that it is locally obtained and therefore legal. Now, under Thai law, this ivory is only supposed to be from elephants in captivity here and certified for sale by the Provincial Administration Department, but black market operators have scant regard for the law. The same can be said of those who carve the ivory and re-export it, mainly to China. As a result, the amount of poaching and elephant slaughter in African countries is spiralling out of control and has reached unsustainable levels. In one recent 12-week period, 12 tonnes of ivory were seized in just four incidents.

This article is older than 60 days, which we reserve for our premium members only.You can subscribe to our premium member subscription, here.

Your comments

  • Discussion 7 : 11 Feb 2013 at 11.077

    Felixqui: I agree, the elephants are pests to many of the farmers in Africa and the Chinese need to realise Viagra is cheaper but my reasons for being sympathetic to their plight are simple and basic:
    1) their extremely high intelligence - same goes for whales and gorillas - looking into the eye of an elephant is like looking into a human eye
    2) their maternal instincts akin to humans and that they are the only known land mammals apart from us idiots that are known to mourn their dead - this leads back to intelligence
    3) slaughtering an animal of their mass for such a minute part of their total body seems utterly retarded and illogical

  • Discussion 6 : 11 Feb 2013 at 09.346

    Tens of thousands of elephants are killed yearly in Africa to meet Asia’s demand for their ivory tusks and products, such as trinkets and jewellery. While elephants are revered in Thailand, the country has the world’s largest unregulated ivory market.

    WWF and TRAFFIC are running a global campaign to secure legal reform to ban all ivory trade in Thailand, until there is a credible mechanism for regulation. Sign the petition at www.panda.org/ban

  • Discussion 5 : 09 Feb 2013 at 11.395

    mogy71,
    No, I think it's about finding a solution that is just for all concerned.
    If people in the African countries where elephants live were able to own and breed elephants for their ivory and other products, they would have a strong incentive to protect them. Now, elephants are pests to them.

    If the Chinese or whoever buy ivory as a medicine learned how stupid that is, they might stop.

    If the elephants were farmed like pigs, would you still object? What's the difference?

  • dao

    ThailandPost : 4,631

    Send message

    Discussion 4 : 09 Feb 2013 at 11.004

    I would like to stamp out animal trafficking, human trafficking ,drug trafficking so thailand wont be a trafficking hub .Its not really something to be proud of .

  • dao

    ThailandPost : 4,631

    Send message

    Discussion 3 : 09 Feb 2013 at 11.003

    I would like to stamp out animal trafficking, human trafficking ,drug trafficking so thailand wont be a trafficking hub .Its not really something to be proud of .

  • Discussion 2 : 09 Feb 2013 at 09.312

    Felixqui: isn't it about the fact that at the present rate of killing, the elephant which reproduces at nowhere near the rate of the pig, will not take much more to bring it to extinction.

  • Discussion 1 : 09 Feb 2013 at 06.151

    Is the ivory being put to moral or immoral uses in the countries where it ends up?

    If traditional cultures are immoral in their use of ivory, perhaps a better solution is to correct their false moral beliefs - that is likely to prove a far more enduring and also just solution to the perceived problem than trying to enforce laws that seem to many, especially those in poor lands with elephants, prima facie unjust.
    Are the bans on killing and trading in elephants in fact just? Or merely rich Westerners imposing on poor Africans? How could it be more wrong to kill an elephant than a pig for dinner?

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.