US thinks Iran behind cyberattack | Bangkok Post: tech

Tech > Computer

US thinks Iran behind cyberattack

The United States believes Iran was behind a major cyberattack on Saudi Arabia's state oil company and a Qatari gas firm, a former US official who has worked on cybersecurity issues said.

File photo shows a flame from a Saudi Aramco oil installion in the desert near the oil-rich area of Khouris. The United States believes Iran was behind a major cyberattack on Saudi Arabia's state oil company and a Qatari gas firm, a former US official who has worked on cybersecurity issues said.

In a major cybersecurity speech on Thursday, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta issued a veiled warning to Tehran that Washington is ready to take preemptive action to protect US computer networks, the former official said.

US government agencies have concluded that Iran orchestrated the "shamoon" virus that disabled tens of thousands of computers at Saudi Aramco and struck Qatari natural gas firm RasGas as well, said James Lewis, who has worked for the State Department and other government agencies on national security and cyber issues.

American officials had "more than a suspicion" that Iran was to blame for the August attacks, that also possibly included recent denial of service attacks on some US banks, said Lewis, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.

"There's generally a conviction that it was Iran," he told AFP.

Lewis said he was not privy to the intelligence reports that backed up the assertion, but said it was implausible the Iranian government would not be aware of a major cyber operation coming from sources inside the country.

"How could you do something that consumed a massive amount of bandwidth in Iran and not have the government notice, when it's monitoring the Internet for political purposes?" he asked.

US government officials had concluded that Iran likely launched the attack in retaliation for US-led sanctions over its nuclear program and a cyber sabotage campaign reportedly backed by Washington, he said.

A senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told AFP the cyberattack on the Gulf oil giants was believed to be carried out by a "state actor" and acknowledged that Iran would be a prime suspect.

In his speech, Panetta referred to the "shamoon" virus for the first time publicly, saying it erased critical files on about 30,000 computers at Saudi Aramco, the world's largest oil company.

He said the virus, which hit Qatar's Rasgas a few days later, was "probably the most destructive attack that the private sector has seen to date."

The Pentagon chief also spoke of "foreign actors" probing sensitive US networks and cited denial of service attacks on some large US financial companies in recent weeks.

While he reiterated US concerns about cyber threats linked to Russia and China, Panetta said Iran was building up its digital capabilities.

In the same speech to business executives in New York, Panetta said the United States had improved its ability to track the origin of digital attacks and suggested the military stood ready to take preemptive action in cyberspace to protect vital networks.

"He came as close to fingering Iran for some of the disruptions we've seen in the last month as you could do without actually saying it by name," said Lewis, who has advised the US government on cyber security.

"Hopefully, the Iranians picked it up as a warning."

Iran has advanced its digital warfare capacity faster than US officials had anticipated, Lewis said, though the attack on Saudi Aramco was relatively unsophisticated.

"We're used to China, we're used to Russia. But Iran is new, Iran is different. And a lot of people didn't think it would develop this quickly," he said.

US officials said information about the recent cyberattacks was declassified to allow Panetta to refer to the incidents in his speech.

The "shamoon" virus wiped out crucial files and replaced them with images of burning American flags.

Two weeks after the August 15th cyberattack on Saudi Aramco, the company announced it had restored its main internal network and that the assault had not disrupted oil production.

The firm targeted in Qatar, RasGas, is a joint venture between American oil firm Exxon Mobil Corp and state-controlled Qatar Petroleum.

Bangkok Post online classifieds

Try buying & selling goods and properties 24/7 in our classifieds which has high purchasing power local & expatriate audience from within Thailand and around the world.

Your comments

  • Discussion 8 : 15 Oct 2012 at 20.438

    #5, the largest population of Jews living in the Middle East, outside of Israel is in Iran. Despite being a minority, they have been given 3 permanent seats within Iran's parliament. Despite being offered money and significant political pressure to leave (by Israel), they have decided to stay. Read "Which Path to Persia?" where US-Israeli policy makers admit Iran seeks to avoid war, and poses a threat only to Western hegemony, not the security of either the US or Israel.

  • Discussion 7 : 15 Oct 2012 at 20.357

    The governments of both the US and Israel have openly conspired for years in their policy papers to use covert means to provoke Iran, as well as fabricate provocations in order to justify war. Look up, "Which Path to Persia?" written by US policy makers for the Fortune 500 funded Brookings Institution. A signed confession. Similar machinations have been employed versus Syria, Libya, and many other nations.

  • Discussion 6 : 13 Oct 2012 at 19.506

    @hillfarang: No, I was never in Israel, or in Iran or anywhere near that area. Over the years I met a couple of people from both countries and I had no problems with neither of them.
    When you write about vibrant Israel you seem to forget their aggressive settlement policy and what a substantial part of Israelis call “their god given land”. I saw enough about those crazy and aggressive settlers (not in person but in the media) to know Israel has its fair share of lunatics.
    Iran has for sure also enough lunatics but I am not able to tell if a majority of people there are crazy Jew hating radicals – somehow I doubt that.
    Coming back to the article and (cyber) war from one country against another: It’s enough that there are some radicals who seek to destroy someone else country. And I think we can agree that there are enough nutters in Iran and Israel. And of course the USA has also more than enough of them…

  • Discussion 5 : 13 Oct 2012 at 14.335

    D@4 Your comparison of Israel & Iran is simply not true! It's just fashionable political correctness of the left. I'll bet that you've never even been to Israel... (I lived & worked there for 14 months). Facts I SAW: Israel is a vibrant democracy with ARAB MK's, allows Islamic mosques & calls to prayer, has admissions to Israeli Universities, has a vibrant economy, allows Christianity & Christmas, tolerant to women's rights & gay matters, has an independent (left leaning) judiciary, has produced so many inventions & Nobel prize winners, etc.

    Not only is Iran & the rest of the ME none of these things, do you know that Jews cannot worship (or live!) in many Arab ME countries! Iran prosecutes & penalizes women & gays (who live freely in Israel. Stop spouting propaganda about the non-people (Pals) & go there & check it out. Israel took in their refugees but not Egypt, KSA, etc. I'll bet that you wouldn't / live in Iran, but I thrived in Israel (freedom).

  • Discussion 4 : 13 Oct 2012 at 12.094

    @hillfarang #2 you write “cyber attacks, and nuclear ambitions require tough action beyond economic sanctions & "talk-talk-talk.”
    So when will the USA start its tough action against Israel? When will they start economic sanctions against the country which has not just ambitions but real nuclear weapons? And when will the USA act against the developers from Stuxnet, one of the most sophisticated cyber-attacks?

  • Discussion 3 : 13 Oct 2012 at 11.553

    It’s good that “American officials” report and condemn cyber-attacks. These attacks can be dangerous and deadly like conventional warfare.
    But somehow I must have missed the American condemnation about the Stuxnet worm which targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities. In Wikipedia we can read “Kaspersky Lab concluded that the sophisticated attack could only have been conducted "with nation-state support” and “It has been speculated that Israel and the United States may have been involved.”
    So is it possible that the USA condemns cyber-attacks when they suspect the attacks come from Iran and target America and its allies but when the USA launches these attacks themselves with Israel together and the target is Iran then that is perfectly alright? Double standards?

  • Discussion 2 : 13 Oct 2012 at 11.452

    USA is still too involved in Afghanistan (not much of a threat) and not Iran whose support of terrorists in Lebanon, cyber attacks, and nuclear ambitions require tough action beyond economic sanctions & "talk-talk-talk."

    Sadly, they only understand & respect force.

  • Discussion 1 : 13 Oct 2012 at 11.271

    Another accusation from the same evil people that accused Iraq of having weapons of mass destruction. A more appropriate headline would be "US Claims to Think...."

Reply

Sign in once and access every part of the website at your convenience!

Please log in to our Bangkokpost.com community to post your comment.
You can sign in to the community by clicking here.

If you are not part of the community yet, please sign up here. By being part of this community you will get all these privileges.