Defence deal
Re: "New sub deal to boost defence," (BP, March 15).
For those of you interested in the Indo-Pacific, interesting news this week: Australia has agreed to buy submarines from the US, and has decided on UK designs.
Not only is this interesting in that it "confirms" attempts to promote equilibrium in the Indo-Pacific -- ie, states countering an increasingly aggressive PRC -- but it also begs the question, what now for diverse Indo-Pacific states, and long-standing allies of AUKUS states, including Thailand?
For me, it's perhaps hard to tell. After giving it some thought, perhaps the benefits are numerous.
With this deal, it appears we're on a path to creating thousands of jobs in Australia, which could perhaps lead to (many) jobs in other Indo-Pacific states. With this deal, we're on a path to distributing fundamental skills and mindsets to other states, perhaps leading to tech and humanitarian revolutions.
We are also showing states like the Philippines that we're serious about promoting the international order and sovereignty of territory.
With this deal, we're showing the world that the US is serious about delivering on security, which can reassure places like Thailand, especially after the Afghanistan fiasco, bolstering alliances.
Some reports say the US is increasingly weak -- so weak it has to depend on its allies to create a bulwark against China -- which may lead some to think the US (or even AUKUS) can't contribute to security in Indo-Pacific states.
This is not really a legitimate argument. Distributing resources to allies in the region does not mean a state is weak, and is actually an excellent strategy, one we find in history, including WWII.
I'm keen to hear -- what do the readers of the Bangkok Post think?
Joseph J Black
Comments will be moderated at 06:00-18:00 (UTC+7). Multiple duplicate comments, immoral, unlawful, obscene, threatening, libelous, anything related to the Thai Royal family, self-advertising, or racist comments will be ignored. For full policies, please view www.bangkokpost.com/terms (section 1.1.1).