Reds invented elites
Re: “Correcting a biased view of the Shinawatras”, (PostBag, Oct 29).
Mr Barlow is incorrect in saying Thailand's rural poor has been pitted against the Thai elite since democracy was birthed in Thailand; that nobody cared about the rural poor until Thaksin came and that they hardly bothered to vote.
It is equally incorrect to say that Thaksin acknowledged the division in Thai society, and for the first time in history attempted to improve the lot of the poor majority.
I do not know how long Mr Barlow has been living in Thailand to interpret these happenings, or who gave him such information.
But there were no class differences in our society after King Rama V peacefully ended slavery and eradicated the class-based society.
Before Thaksin, the Thai nation lived in relative harmony. There was no difference whether you were rich or poor, educated or uneducated, influential or not influential and whether you were Thai or foreigner.
The elite class, or ammart status, was in fact introduced by the red shirts. They deliberately set out to divide our society, create hatred and separate rural Thais from the urban Thais.
As an former officer for the Ministry of Interior for 37 years, I organised or supervised the general elections before my retirement. Until 1997, general elections fell under the responsibility of the Ministry of Interior.
Rural people were eager to cast their votes. But because they were close to their village heads, schoolteachers, monks and government officers, they respected their advice and followed them.
Only those who sold their votes to canvassers, or were threatened by influential people, had to do what they were told.
There are good and bad people in every society, and past governments did not do enough to quell the bad people.
People in the countryside were fooled by red politicians into the kind of life that put them in debt and taught them to live on credit.
Poor farmers fell headfirst into the traps set by red politicians. They began to mortgage their land with government banks. Eventually these banks went bankrupt and were sold off to the public.
It was the cruellest way to take farmers’ lands and make profits from state-owned properties. If the military had not intervened, Thais today would still be fighting among themselves with the North, Isan province and possibly also the South.
Thailand would likely have become a fragmented nation, a failed state. Most Thai people recognise this, and support what the current government is trying to do for the country.
Populist policies are acceptable to a degree provided there is no corruption in their implementation. The rice scheme would not have been not bad if it had been done properly, and for the benefit of the people.
But corruption was widespread and billions of baht went into the pockets of rogue politicians. The prime minister was fair by not using his special powers to punish the previous government, but instead leaving the decision to the Court of Justice. History will decide who was right and who was wrong.
Dusit Thammaraks
Comments will be moderated at 06:00-18:00 (UTC+7). Multiple duplicate comments, immoral, unlawful, obscene, threatening, libelous, anything related to the Thai Royal family, self-advertising, or racist comments will be ignored. For full policies, please view www.bangkokpost.com/terms (section 1.1.1).